My Photo

Tetsuo Twitters

del.icio.us Trees

Dopplr

SlideShare

Blog powered by TypePad

June 23, 2009

Iranian Vote Fraud Stands in Stark Contrast to Recent Shifts in Middle East

Christopher Hitchens gives a great roundup of the stunning, and extraordinarily under-reported liberal shift in Middle Eastern politics:
The obvious evidence of fixing, fraud, and force to one side, there is another reason to doubt that an illiterate fundamentalist like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could have increased even a state-sponsored plebiscite-type majority. Everywhere else in the Muslim world, in every election in the last two years, the tendency has been the other way. In Morocco in 2007, the much-ballyhooed Justice and Development Party wound up with 14 percent of the vote. In Malaysia and Indonesia, the predictions of increased market share for the pro-Sharia parties were likewise falsified. In Iraq this last January, the local elections penalized the clerical parties that had been making life a misery in cities like Basra. In neighboring Kuwait last month, the Islamist forces did poorly, and four women—including the striking figure of Rola Dashti, who refuses to wear any headgear—were elected to the 50-member parliament. Most important of all, perhaps, Iranian-sponsored Hezbollah was convincingly and unexpectedly defeated last week in Lebanon after an open and vigorous election, the results of which were not challenged by any party. And, from all I hear, if the Palestinians were to vote again this year—as they were at one point supposed to do—it would be highly improbable that Hamas would emerge the victor.
Read the whole thing.

February 03, 2009

Goldman's Take on Potential Good-Bank / Bad-Bank Structures

09.01.29.Good Bank-Bad Bank (hat-tip The Big Picture)

September 19, 2008

"Gang-Raped by My Big Black Brothers"

via NewsBusters.org - Sandra Bernhard: Palin Would Be Gang-Raped By Blacks in Manhattan:

When Sandra warns Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some of Sandra’s big black brothers, she’s being provocative, combative, humorous, and yes, let’s allow, disgusting.

- Ari Roth, Theater J

Long ago did the hate spewed at Sarah Palin from the left cross from the realm of the pathetic into the realm of the demented.  That the Washington Post and the Washington Examiner could find nothing wrong with such a suggestion, despite the fact that it flies blatantly in the face of EVERYTHING liberal political correctness has rammed down our throats for the past generation, is likewise ridiculous. 

We are witnessing the public coming out of the worst elements the left has to offer - a hate-driven, hypocritical, infantile, almost-masochistic in its raging sect bent on concealing the embarrassing exposure of its wrongness with the most vile forms of insult and outright misogyny I have ever witnessed on such a scale.  That those elements are being supported, nigh, embraced by the mainstream media, the culture and the Democrat Party makes me ill.  How have things in the party of Roosevelt and Kennedy fallen so far?

Is THIS the change I'm supposed to be hoping for?

 

August 30, 2008

You're On Your Own

Via WSJ.com - Declarations:

"In Washington they call this the Ownership Society, but what that really means is: You're on your own."

- U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois), In His Acceptance Speech as the 2008 Democrat Presidential Nominee

I am having problems recalling a line uttered by a Presidential candidate that has pissed me off so much as this one...

David Frum's Diary on National Review Online

Via David Frum's Diary on NRO - Palin:

Here's I fear the worst harm that may be done by this selection. The McCain campaign's slogan is "country first." It's a good slogan, and it aptly describes John McCain, one of the most self-sacrificing, gallant, and honorable men ever to seek the presidency.

But question: If it were your decision, and you were putting your country first, would you put an untested small-town mayor a heartbeat away from the presidency?

When the other choice you have is to elect Barack Obama and Joe Biden, you be'cher ass my friend.  You be'cher ass...

August 29, 2008

Clinton Still the Better Choice for the Dems?

Via NRO - Big Wind No Rain [Andy McCarthy]:

I don't think this is rose-tinted earplugs:  LAME.  This is a very weak candidate.  As I'll argue in a piece for tomorrow, there's no question Hillary would be the candidate — and a far more formidable one — were it not for the Clintons' insouciance about terrorism.

On the first point I agree - Obama isn't a very strong candidate when viewed with objective, merit-based lenses.  But that's precisely the point.  The people who are most enamored with the man - and I find that people either tend to love him or despise him - are among the least objective I've seen in modern politics.  For them he tugs on so many bleeding-heart guilt-assuaging valve-strings that it would be well-nigh impossible for the to vote for anyone else.  What's more, such people are simply more numerous than those who choose to take a step back, disassociate Obama from their own inate political desires, and really look at the man behind the mirror.

Perhaps a perfect campaign from the Clintons would have propelled Hillary to the nomination - and I believe at this stage that she would have won the general had she been nominated - but the campaign the Clintons ran was deeply flawed.  (No one would have expected such an extreme lack of organization in caucus states costing her the election - these were, after all, the most feared, and fearsome, campaigners in the modern political game.)  Ultimately, however, I don't think it would have mattered.  Obama is the right candidate for today's Democrat party.  Whether he's the right candidate for today's United States of America remains to be seen. 

For all the griping on the right about his record and willingness to "reach across the aisle," John McCain has a very real shot at winning this thing. 

VDH on Obama's Two Nations

Via NRO - Two Nations [Victor Davis Hanson]:

This Democratic propensity to plead poverty and oppression to highlight one's own success — along with the therapeutic anecdote — finally becomes numbing. Obama, who gained his education and found opportunity in the awful Reagan and Bush I years, lives in a mansion, has prep school and Ivy League degrees, made several millions of dollars last year, and was the offspring of two PhD candidates — and is thus a firsthand witness to America's greed and unfairness?

If Obama were to win, no one would infer from the desolation he described in America, that he may well inherit an economy, in a downturn, that just grew at 3.3 in the last quarter, an unemployment rate of 5.7%, and record levels of exportation, one that did not go into recession with $140 a barrel oil, with more students in college than at any time in its history and more than any other nation in the world, with a war in Iraq nearly won, and both the Taliban and Saddam Hussein gone and replaced with constitutional governments — and Europe, whether in France, Germany, or Italy, with strong pro-American leadership.

No one would infer that after our enemies blew a 16-acre crater in New York and attacked the Pentagon — and promised lots more to come — we have not been hit since, but in contrast, al Qaeda's leaders are either in hiding, scattered, imprisoned, or killed, with bin Laden and the tactic of suicide bombing with record low levels of support in the Middle East.

His bottom line: our enemies are winning, AK-47s are ubiquitous in our streets, our economy is in depression, and gay people can't visit their dying partners in our hospitals. In short, "Hope and Change" has became gloom and doom and there is something for everybody from government to save us.

Vic Hanson, being Vic Hanson.  Had we only a hundred more like  him...

August 17, 2008

Putin Crosses the Rhine

Via the U.K. Telegraph Online - Ukraine offers satellite defence co-operation with Europe and US:

Just hours before Mr Medvedev put his signature to the ceasefire deal, Russian forces blew up a Georgian railway bridge on the main line west of the capital, Tbilisi, an act that critics interpreted as a malacious attempt to cripple the country's infrastructure. Moscow at first issued a denial, but television footage shot by the Reuters news agency clearly showed the bridge's twisted remains.

The Russians are clearly playing for keeps here, and it will be interesting to see how seriously they take the collective U.S. / E.U. / Former Soviet Satellite response.  History tells us that, until fairly recently anyway, the West was NOT to be taken too seriously - that its rhetoric was largely hollow, and its threats largely empty.  Now enough blood has been spilled in places like Iraq and Afghanistan to give some potential adversaries pause.  But the Russians cannot be allowed to use the Georgian incursion as a sort of "Caesar Crosses the Rhine" moment.  Only very strong retaliation will see to it that is not the case.  But is such a resonse even possible?

The layers of potential response are interesting in and of themselves.  The former Soviet-bloc states have some room to maneuver, and have a very existential reason to do so.  And so Poland and Ukraine move quickly to join the U.S.-led missile shield, as they should.  Expect more such states to follow suit.

Soliciting a strong response from the Europeans, however, is a much more difficult task.  Russia is a key supplier of energy resources to the European continent, and any economic sanctions against Russia will cause acute pain throughout the region during a time of particularly weak economic performance.  So it is questionable whether the E.U. will be able to muster the political muscle to respond in a fashion befitting the situation.  Nick Sarkozy played what role he could in securing a peace, but expecting more from him or the rest of the Union with respect to maintaining it seems aggressive.  And really, what kind of support could the Euros provide to a Baltic or Central-Asian state under siege?  The Russians pose a military threat far more powerful than any defense the E.U. member nations could call to the aid of a distressed state.

And what of the U.S.?  Here, the Emperor truly seems to have no clothes.  Military commanders admit, openly and loudly, to being surprised by the speed and nature of the Russian incursion, as well as to a complete inability to counter the advance should the use of force have been warranted.  How's that for backing your President's words with the full power of the most awesome military force the world has ever seen?  And so the President gives Vladimir Putin an angry look and some harsh words between patting a women's beach volleyball player's butt and watching Michael Phelps carry out an annihilation of a different sort in Beijing, receiving a look back from the Former KGB operative that would have turned Medusa to stone.  And a couple of days later, more words about the international community's stance on South Ossetia and Abkhazia being a part of Georgia.  (I'm sure the Georgians living under the barrells of Russian AK's would have something to say about that.)  But, what?  Really, is there anything of great substance the U.S. can do in retaliation?

Perhaps the near-term answer is no.  Cosmetically, the addition of as many Russian border states as possible to the missile shield, as well as the provision of greater weapons, logisitical and training support to those states could provide a measure of deterence.  And perhaps those kinds of measures will be enough to provide a peaceful bridge to long-term solutions. 

Whatever the case, the precariousness that comes with Russia's re-assertion of its military strength must be taken extremely seriously.  Unless they want to see their boys engaged in a protracted conflict with just the kind of monolithic nuclear threat they have spent the last decade trying so desperately to pronounce dead, American voters had better take note.

August 12, 2008

Orator Barack Not Up to Historical Democrat Standard

Via WSJ.com's Best of the Web Today (James Taranto) - Great Orators of the Democratic Party:

  • "One man with courage makes a majority." - attributed to Andrew Jackson
  • "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

  • "The buck stops here." - Harry S. Truman
  • "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." - John F. Kennedy

  • "America is--is no longer, uh, what it--it could be, what it was once was. And I say to myself, 'I don't want that future for my children.''" - Barack Obama

I love this bit James Taranto does on his Best of the Web Today column.  This one in particular gives a nice glimpse of Barack Obama "off-telestrator," where he is a FAR cry from the polished orator so many are accustomed to seeing.  The media have been far to the poor side of bad in covering his campaign, but people are hard to fool for too long.  His armor is already dented, badly, and his poll numbers are falling.  Little bits of ineloquence like this will only hasten the fall.


links for 2008-08-12 [delicious.com]

June 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

Search


  • www
    tetsuoblog.typepad.com